Review




Structured Review

Insphero Inc lec cell line
Lec Cell Line, supplied by Insphero Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lec cell line/product/Insphero Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lec cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

97
ATCC b3 lec cell line
B3 Lec Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/b3 lec cell line/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b3 lec cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Insphero Inc lec cell line
Lec Cell Line, supplied by Insphero Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lec cell line/product/Insphero Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lec cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ScienCell lec cell line
Fig. 1 IEC stimulation increases HIV infection of resting CD4 + T cells. Here and throughout the paper, boxplots show the median (horizontal line), and the central box extends to the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers then extend 1.5 inter-quartile ranges or to the minimum or maximum observed value, whichever is closer to the median. A Infection rates in T cells stimulated with endothelial cells. Resting T cells were cultured alone (Resting), or co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC), human lymphatic endothelial cells <t>(LEC),</t> or human intestinal endothelial cells (IEC). + and − indicate treatment with or without IFN-γ respectively in EC, LEC, or IEC. All T cells were infected with an HIV reporter virus expressing GFP 1 day after co-culture, and the %GFP+ cells were measured on day 6 post-infection. Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 5). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). B Expression of activation markers versus GFP expression in IEC + stimulated resting CD4 + T cells. Similar to A, but on day 6 post-infection, T cells were stained for three activation markers: CD25, CD69, and HLA-DR. C Expression of activation markers and infection rates in T cells with and without IEC stimulation (n = 3), similar to ( B ). D Infection rates in resting memory and naïve T cells stimulated with IEC. Memory and naïve T cells <t>were</t> <t>isolated,</t> and the rest of the experimental procedures are the same as ( A ). Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 3). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (****p<0.0001).
Lec Cell Line, supplied by ScienCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lec cell line/product/ScienCell
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lec cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Lonza human lec cell line
Fig. 1 IEC stimulation increases HIV infection of resting CD4 + T cells. Here and throughout the paper, boxplots show the median (horizontal line), and the central box extends to the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers then extend 1.5 inter-quartile ranges or to the minimum or maximum observed value, whichever is closer to the median. A Infection rates in T cells stimulated with endothelial cells. Resting T cells were cultured alone (Resting), or co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC), human lymphatic endothelial cells <t>(LEC),</t> or human intestinal endothelial cells (IEC). + and − indicate treatment with or without IFN-γ respectively in EC, LEC, or IEC. All T cells were infected with an HIV reporter virus expressing GFP 1 day after co-culture, and the %GFP+ cells were measured on day 6 post-infection. Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 5). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). B Expression of activation markers versus GFP expression in IEC + stimulated resting CD4 + T cells. Similar to A, but on day 6 post-infection, T cells were stained for three activation markers: CD25, CD69, and HLA-DR. C Expression of activation markers and infection rates in T cells with and without IEC stimulation (n = 3), similar to ( B ). D Infection rates in resting memory and naïve T cells stimulated with IEC. Memory and naïve T cells <t>were</t> <t>isolated,</t> and the rest of the experimental procedures are the same as ( A ). Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 3). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (****p<0.0001).
Human Lec Cell Line, supplied by Lonza, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human lec cell line/product/Lonza
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human lec cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
R&D Systems lec cell line sra01 04
Fig. 1 IEC stimulation increases HIV infection of resting CD4 + T cells. Here and throughout the paper, boxplots show the median (horizontal line), and the central box extends to the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers then extend 1.5 inter-quartile ranges or to the minimum or maximum observed value, whichever is closer to the median. A Infection rates in T cells stimulated with endothelial cells. Resting T cells were cultured alone (Resting), or co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC), human lymphatic endothelial cells <t>(LEC),</t> or human intestinal endothelial cells (IEC). + and − indicate treatment with or without IFN-γ respectively in EC, LEC, or IEC. All T cells were infected with an HIV reporter virus expressing GFP 1 day after co-culture, and the %GFP+ cells were measured on day 6 post-infection. Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 5). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). B Expression of activation markers versus GFP expression in IEC + stimulated resting CD4 + T cells. Similar to A, but on day 6 post-infection, T cells were stained for three activation markers: CD25, CD69, and HLA-DR. C Expression of activation markers and infection rates in T cells with and without IEC stimulation (n = 3), similar to ( B ). D Infection rates in resting memory and naïve T cells stimulated with IEC. Memory and naïve T cells <t>were</t> <t>isolated,</t> and the rest of the experimental procedures are the same as ( A ). Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 3). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (****p<0.0001).
Lec Cell Line Sra01 04, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lec cell line sra01 04/product/R&D Systems
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lec cell line sra01 04 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ATCC human lens epithelial cell lec line hle b3
Fig. 1 IEC stimulation increases HIV infection of resting CD4 + T cells. Here and throughout the paper, boxplots show the median (horizontal line), and the central box extends to the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers then extend 1.5 inter-quartile ranges or to the minimum or maximum observed value, whichever is closer to the median. A Infection rates in T cells stimulated with endothelial cells. Resting T cells were cultured alone (Resting), or co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC), human lymphatic endothelial cells <t>(LEC),</t> or human intestinal endothelial cells (IEC). + and − indicate treatment with or without IFN-γ respectively in EC, LEC, or IEC. All T cells were infected with an HIV reporter virus expressing GFP 1 day after co-culture, and the %GFP+ cells were measured on day 6 post-infection. Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 5). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). B Expression of activation markers versus GFP expression in IEC + stimulated resting CD4 + T cells. Similar to A, but on day 6 post-infection, T cells were stained for three activation markers: CD25, CD69, and HLA-DR. C Expression of activation markers and infection rates in T cells with and without IEC stimulation (n = 3), similar to ( B ). D Infection rates in resting memory and naïve T cells stimulated with IEC. Memory and naïve T cells <t>were</t> <t>isolated,</t> and the rest of the experimental procedures are the same as ( A ). Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 3). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (****p<0.0001).
Human Lens Epithelial Cell Lec Line Hle B3, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human lens epithelial cell lec line hle b3/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human lens epithelial cell lec line hle b3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ATCC human lecs hle b3 cell line
Fig. 1 IEC stimulation increases HIV infection of resting CD4 + T cells. Here and throughout the paper, boxplots show the median (horizontal line), and the central box extends to the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers then extend 1.5 inter-quartile ranges or to the minimum or maximum observed value, whichever is closer to the median. A Infection rates in T cells stimulated with endothelial cells. Resting T cells were cultured alone (Resting), or co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC), human lymphatic endothelial cells <t>(LEC),</t> or human intestinal endothelial cells (IEC). + and − indicate treatment with or without IFN-γ respectively in EC, LEC, or IEC. All T cells were infected with an HIV reporter virus expressing GFP 1 day after co-culture, and the %GFP+ cells were measured on day 6 post-infection. Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 5). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). B Expression of activation markers versus GFP expression in IEC + stimulated resting CD4 + T cells. Similar to A, but on day 6 post-infection, T cells were stained for three activation markers: CD25, CD69, and HLA-DR. C Expression of activation markers and infection rates in T cells with and without IEC stimulation (n = 3), similar to ( B ). D Infection rates in resting memory and naïve T cells stimulated with IEC. Memory and naïve T cells <t>were</t> <t>isolated,</t> and the rest of the experimental procedures are the same as ( A ). Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 3). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (****p<0.0001).
Human Lecs Hle B3 Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human lecs hle b3 cell line/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human lecs hle b3 cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Lonza lec cell line
Fig. 1 IEC stimulation increases HIV infection of resting CD4 + T cells. Here and throughout the paper, boxplots show the median (horizontal line), and the central box extends to the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers then extend 1.5 inter-quartile ranges or to the minimum or maximum observed value, whichever is closer to the median. A Infection rates in T cells stimulated with endothelial cells. Resting T cells were cultured alone (Resting), or co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC), human lymphatic endothelial cells <t>(LEC),</t> or human intestinal endothelial cells (IEC). + and − indicate treatment with or without IFN-γ respectively in EC, LEC, or IEC. All T cells were infected with an HIV reporter virus expressing GFP 1 day after co-culture, and the %GFP+ cells were measured on day 6 post-infection. Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 5). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). B Expression of activation markers versus GFP expression in IEC + stimulated resting CD4 + T cells. Similar to A, but on day 6 post-infection, T cells were stained for three activation markers: CD25, CD69, and HLA-DR. C Expression of activation markers and infection rates in T cells with and without IEC stimulation (n = 3), similar to ( B ). D Infection rates in resting memory and naïve T cells stimulated with IEC. Memory and naïve T cells <t>were</t> <t>isolated,</t> and the rest of the experimental procedures are the same as ( A ). Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 3). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (****p<0.0001).
Lec Cell Line, supplied by Lonza, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lec cell line/product/Lonza
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lec cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ATCC t antigen negative rat lung epithelial cell line rle 6tn lec
Fig. 1 IEC stimulation increases HIV infection of resting CD4 + T cells. Here and throughout the paper, boxplots show the median (horizontal line), and the central box extends to the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers then extend 1.5 inter-quartile ranges or to the minimum or maximum observed value, whichever is closer to the median. A Infection rates in T cells stimulated with endothelial cells. Resting T cells were cultured alone (Resting), or co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC), human lymphatic endothelial cells <t>(LEC),</t> or human intestinal endothelial cells (IEC). + and − indicate treatment with or without IFN-γ respectively in EC, LEC, or IEC. All T cells were infected with an HIV reporter virus expressing GFP 1 day after co-culture, and the %GFP+ cells were measured on day 6 post-infection. Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 5). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). B Expression of activation markers versus GFP expression in IEC + stimulated resting CD4 + T cells. Similar to A, but on day 6 post-infection, T cells were stained for three activation markers: CD25, CD69, and HLA-DR. C Expression of activation markers and infection rates in T cells with and without IEC stimulation (n = 3), similar to ( B ). D Infection rates in resting memory and naïve T cells stimulated with IEC. Memory and naïve T cells <t>were</t> <t>isolated,</t> and the rest of the experimental procedures are the same as ( A ). Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 3). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (****p<0.0001).
T Antigen Negative Rat Lung Epithelial Cell Line Rle 6tn Lec, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/t antigen negative rat lung epithelial cell line rle 6tn lec/product/ATCC
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
t antigen negative rat lung epithelial cell line rle 6tn lec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 1 IEC stimulation increases HIV infection of resting CD4 + T cells. Here and throughout the paper, boxplots show the median (horizontal line), and the central box extends to the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers then extend 1.5 inter-quartile ranges or to the minimum or maximum observed value, whichever is closer to the median. A Infection rates in T cells stimulated with endothelial cells. Resting T cells were cultured alone (Resting), or co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC), human lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC), or human intestinal endothelial cells (IEC). + and − indicate treatment with or without IFN-γ respectively in EC, LEC, or IEC. All T cells were infected with an HIV reporter virus expressing GFP 1 day after co-culture, and the %GFP+ cells were measured on day 6 post-infection. Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 5). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). B Expression of activation markers versus GFP expression in IEC + stimulated resting CD4 + T cells. Similar to A, but on day 6 post-infection, T cells were stained for three activation markers: CD25, CD69, and HLA-DR. C Expression of activation markers and infection rates in T cells with and without IEC stimulation (n = 3), similar to ( B ). D Infection rates in resting memory and naïve T cells stimulated with IEC. Memory and naïve T cells were isolated, and the rest of the experimental procedures are the same as ( A ). Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 3). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (****p<0.0001).

Journal: Retrovirology

Article Title: Intestinal endothelial cells increase HIV infection and latency in resting and activated CD4 + T cells, particularly affecting CCR6 + CD4 + T cells

doi: 10.1186/s12977-023-00621-y

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1 IEC stimulation increases HIV infection of resting CD4 + T cells. Here and throughout the paper, boxplots show the median (horizontal line), and the central box extends to the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers then extend 1.5 inter-quartile ranges or to the minimum or maximum observed value, whichever is closer to the median. A Infection rates in T cells stimulated with endothelial cells. Resting T cells were cultured alone (Resting), or co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EC), human lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC), or human intestinal endothelial cells (IEC). + and − indicate treatment with or without IFN-γ respectively in EC, LEC, or IEC. All T cells were infected with an HIV reporter virus expressing GFP 1 day after co-culture, and the %GFP+ cells were measured on day 6 post-infection. Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 5). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001). B Expression of activation markers versus GFP expression in IEC + stimulated resting CD4 + T cells. Similar to A, but on day 6 post-infection, T cells were stained for three activation markers: CD25, CD69, and HLA-DR. C Expression of activation markers and infection rates in T cells with and without IEC stimulation (n = 3), similar to ( B ). D Infection rates in resting memory and naïve T cells stimulated with IEC. Memory and naïve T cells were isolated, and the rest of the experimental procedures are the same as ( A ). Samples were taken in triplicate for each donor, and different donors are represented by different symbols (n = 3). P-values are from post-hoc pairwise comparisons of marginal means based on beta generalized linear models (****p<0.0001).

Article Snippet: LEC were obtained from ScienCell Research Laboratories (isolated from human lymph nodes) and cultured in basal endothelial cell medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin solution (P/S) (Invitrogen).

Techniques: Infection, Cell Culture, Virus, Expressing, Co-Culture Assay, Activation Assay, Staining, Isolation